Many parents spend thousands of dollars on computer-based training programs that claim to help children succeed in the classroom and in peer relationships while reducing hyperactivity and inattentiveness. But a 麻豆原创 researcher says parents are better off saving their hard-earned cash.<\/p>\n
Psychology professor Mark Rapport\u2019s research team spent two years analyzing the data from 25 studies and found that those programs are not producing significant or clinically meaningful long-term improvements in children\u2019s cognitive abilities, academic performance or behavior.<\/p>\n
\u201cParents are desperate for help,\u201d said Rapport, who runs the Children\u2019s Learning Clinic IV at 麻豆原创. \u201cIf they can afford it, they are willing to spend the money, and some parents even enroll their children in private schools because they offer these cognitive training programs. But there is no empirical evidence to show those investments are worthwhile.<\/p>\n
Rapport initiated the study because many parents of children who have been evaluated at his clinic asked him whether they should invest in the programs. The study is featured in the December issue of Clinical Psychology Review.<\/p>\n
His team analyzed published studies sponsored by the companies themselves as well as all independent published studies in the literature \u2013 and he drew his conclusions based on analyzing \u201cblinded\u201d studies, meaning studies in which researchers and independent raters used objective measures and did not know which children were assigned to the cognitive training programs as opposed to an inactive placebo condition.<\/p>\n
Working memory represents one of the most important core deficits in children with ADHD, and improvements in working memory are associated with improved academic performance, behavior, peer relationships and other intellectual abilities. Surprisingly, although a majority of the cognitive training programs claimed to train this important aspect of brain functioning, closer examination of their training exercises revealed that they actually train short-term memory.<\/p>\n
Short-term memory stores information in mind for a brief interval, whereas working memory uses the stored information for accomplishing a wide range of cognitive tasks, such as reading comprehension, mental math, and multitasking.<\/p>\n
Rapport said his conclusions do not mean that the computer-based programs cannot become a helpful tool for children with ADHD. If programs can be designed to focus on working memory, it is worth evaluating whether they can help children\u2019s cognitive abilities, academic performance and behavior, he said.<\/p>\n
Rapport, who is a fellow of the American Psychological Association, began teaching at 麻豆原创 in 2000. Early in his career, he worked as a school psychologist in Pinellas County. He was often frustrated that many of the techniques that he and schoolteachers tried would fail to help children with ADHD. As a researcher at three universities prior to coming to 麻豆原创, Rapport studied behavioral and pharmacological treatments for children with ADHD.<\/p>\n
The Children’s Learning Clinic offers free assessments for typically developing boys ages 8 to 12, as well as for children who are experiencing difficulties with attention, learning, memory or concentration and those suspected of having ADHD. The clinic’s free evaluations include intelligence, academic achievement, activity level and memory assessments.<\/p>\n
Co-authors on this study include 麻豆原创 doctoral students Sarah Orban and Lauren Friedman and Michael J. Kofler, a professor with the University of Virginia\u2019s Department of Human Services.<\/p>\n